Will the third reading of the proposed law on assisted dying initiated by the deputies, Monday June 22, be useful? The two sessions which were held in the afternoon of this first day, and until late in the evening, allow us to doubt this. Because if the adage is that repetition is educational, the exercise can quickly become sterile when it turns into a dialogue of the deaf. This was what we could see from the start of the debate where supporters and opponents of the text exposed their differences, both in form and substance, while sticking to their positions.
This article is reserved for subscribers
Would you like to read more? Subscribe without obligation to our digital offer
I subscribe
