Judiciary: PJ workers protest during Minister Ortiz’s visit


The minister of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN), Loretta Ortiz, was received in Guadalajara amid protests by the workers of the Judicial Branch.

Yesterday, during the conference “The challenges for guaranteeing full access to justice in Mexico” and in the midst of the demonstrations, Minister Ortiz said that the statement that the modifications will affect the benefits of those who work in the Judiciary is false. of the Federation.

“It does not violate the rights of workers, their right to work will continue to be respected and they have the right to all benefits, that is, there is no line in the reform in which the rights of workers are not guaranteed,” he stated. .

The minister indicated that the workers of the Judicial Branch of the Federation (PJF) Their job stability will be assured after the enactment of the judicial reform to elect all judges by popular vote starting in 2025.

The minister affirmed that this initiative will not diminish the profile of the judges who are popularly elected since some have already occupied these public positions.

“The profile that the judges and magistrates must have and, in general, the entire system, which is already a reality that we are going to be subject to an election, the profile of the players is not diminished with this initiative, (because) automatically All the judges and magistrates, all the ministers of the Court, will participate,” he stated.

Ortiz had to leave the place early after three workers from the Judicial Branch who managed to enter the conference and interrupted the session with shouts in which they asked for a consultation with those who work in the judicial sector to modify the reform.

The organizers tried to get them out, but due to the exchange of shouts and insults, they decided to end the activity early.

Ortiz was taken to an area guarded by the Mexican Army. The workers left the auditorium surrounded by insults from some of those in charge of logistics but were detained for about 40 minutes before leaving the building, under the argument of preventing the protesters who remained outside from getting in. The three protesters detained They were released after the intervention of Zapopan police officers.

EFE

Loretta Ortiz faces accusations over vote

Last Thursday, the Supreme Court, by eight votes to three, accepted protections from judges and magistrates to review the constitutional reform that former president Andrés Manuel López Obrador promulgated on September 15 to elect members of the Judiciary at the polls. The members of the SCJN related to the Government accused their colleagues of a “technical coup d’état.”

Minister Loretta Ortiz was one of the three who voted against the procedure for the SCJN to review the constitutionality and validity of the judicial reform.

“A weak blow”, CSP accuses the SCJ of stopping

The President of Mexico, Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo (CSP), yesterday accused the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) of a “watered blow” for its attempt to stop the judicial reform to elect all the judges by popular vote. from 2025.

“I rather say that it is a watered-down coup, not a coup d’état. Because, honestly, what basis does it have? The reform of the Judiciary is not in danger, the people decided,” declared the President in her morning conference.

Sheinbaum He criticized the Supreme Court because last Thursday, by eight votes to three, it accepted protections from judges and magistrates to review the constitutional reform that former president Andrés Manuel López Obrador promulgated on September 15 to elect the Judiciary at the polls.

The members of the SCJN related to the Government accused their colleagues of a “technical coup d’état”, but Sheinbaum rejected this adjective and denied acting against the members of the Court.

“What do I think they intend with this? First, let us say: ‘political trial, treason’. We’re not going to do it, that’s my opinion, because what do they want? Demonstrate that we are an authoritarian government, we are not, the President was elected by the people of Mexico,” she responded, questioned by the term. Claudia Sheinbaum argued that the Court’s review “has no basis” because Congress, where the alliance The ruling party has the two-thirds majority necessary to modify the Magna Carta, it has already reformed the Constitution and the SCJN cannot do anything about it.

Like López Obrador, Sheinbaum maintained that the members of the Supreme Court “know that what they are doing is wrong” because they seek to “defend their privileges,” such as income of close to 400 thousand pesos per month, according to his calculations.

EFE

Federal Judicial Council denies information to the Senate about charges

The Federal Judicial Council (CJF) argued that he was unable to provide the Senate with information for the integration of the lists of candidates for the positions of ministers, judges and circuit magistrates, the minister president reported. of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN), Norma Lucía Piña Hernández, in the office CJF/MP/21/2024, which was sent to the president of the Senate, Gerardo Fernández Noroña.

It details that in the next plenary session the actions related to compliance with the suspensions decreed by various jurisdictional bodies will be determined.

The document indicates that the Plenary Council was aware of the existence of the pronouncements of merit and It was agreed that, in the next plenary session, the actions related to compliance with the suspensions decreed by various jurisdictional bodies will be determined.

It highlights that on Monday, September 30, 2024, the Admissions Commission submitted for consideration and voting by its members the Point of Agreement regarding the lists of active federal judges, resignations and vacancies that will be sent to the Senate of the Republic in compliance with the provisions of subsection a), of the Second Transitory Article of the Decree.

The Universal

It will be extended until October 11, as decided by the Federal Judiciary Council and also denied information. SPECIAL

CT

Themes

Read Also

Leave a Comment