In England, the Cardiff court warned against the risks of unregulated sperm donation after a couple of women has lived a nightmare experience with Robert Albon. Nicknamed “Joe Donor”, this man claims to have generated 180 children around the world by promoting his services on social networks, reports the BBC.
Initially chosen for a donation without commitment, Robert Albon then tried to obtain parental rights over the child, to modify his name and to be registered on the birth certificate. He also demanded that the non -biological mother be designated as “aunt” rather than “mother”.
A trying trial for the family
The legal proceedings, which lasted more than two years, had heavy consequences on the family. The stress engendered led to the separation of the couple, and the biological mother suffered from depression, anxiety and suicidal thoughts. The court judged that Robert Albon was not trying to protect the well-being of the child, but acted only in his own interest. J. Jonathan Furness said he was using this case to improve his immigration file in the United Kingdom, an accusation he refutes.
“In reality, it is a man who seeks to control,” said the judge. “Women and children seem to be for him almost a commodity, while he strives to increase the number of his children around the world. The court rejected all its requests, judging that no direct contact with the child would be beneficial. It was only granted to him an “indirect contact”, allowing him to send a card or an email once a year, which will be kept until the child is older to understand his origin.
The dangers of unregulated cum donation
This case highlights the risks of sperm donation outside medical circuits. Unlike approved clinics, which impose strict medical checks and a limit of 10 families per donor, donations made by individuals are not subject to any regulations. However, Robert Albon claims to have generated many more children than the authorized limit.
Find our file on sperm donations
The court also revealed that its donation methods varied between artificial insemination and unprotected sex, thus increasing the medical and legal risks for the women concerned. “Vulnerable women trying to get pregnant should know that they run a risk,” insisted Judge Jonathan Furness.
(tagstotranslate) United Kingdom