Pension reform: the miraculous article

And now the question is: 49-3 or not 49-3? The majority would prefer not to release the 49-3 because it would not be great for the image. At the same time, well, if it’s the only way to pass the law, go for 49-3, France will recover. The opposition does not want 49-3 because it would be a denial of democracy. At the same time, well, if it ends at 49-3, it will give him an additional argument to castigate a reform that nobody wants. The question I ask myself is this: is there really no alternative to 49-3, which does not have a great reputation?

During the debates in the National Assembly and the Senate, the government was able to show ingenuity by pulling out of the closet a 38, a 49.1 and a 44.2, of which few people, in my opinion, knew the existence. By looking carefully, by rummaging through all the drawers, couldn’t we unearth a 38 bis, a 41 and a half, even a 49 zero zero seven forgotten by all, except insiders? Something that doesn’t force the way too much, something cool, something nice, like what, okay, we may not have the majority stricto sensu, but in fact, if you look closely, it turns out that we have it, without wanting to offend you or force your hand, thanks to this miraculous article, an article quite rare in stores, that we only take out on special occasions, but, let’s face it, awfully practical. Answer the day after tomorrow Thursday. Will the government be up to it?

Source