The irregularities that Morena accidentally linked to Sansores instead of Lía Limón in Alvaro Obregón

The mayoress and the governor would be facing each other in court (Cuartoscuro)

On Thursday afternoon, legislators from the Mexico City Congress found themselves in the middle of a discussion after deputies from the National Regeneration Movement (Morena), accidentally implicated one of its members in alleged acts of corruption.

It may interest you: PAN and Morena deputies fought in the CDMX Congress

Since the Morenista deputy Marcela Fuentes presented a point of agreement in which she pointed out Lía Limón, mayoress of Álvaro Obregón for alleged irregularities in a public works contract carried out in May 2021, according to a review by the Superior Audit of the Federation (ASF).

This would be with the company ABC Estudios SA de CV for the amount of 12 million 840 thousand pesos in order to rehabilitate a Civil Protection building within the Álvaro Obregón mayor’s office.

It may interest you: Morenista rebuked Lía Limón about alleged complicity between the PAN and García Luna

But the invitation for the direct adjudication of the work did not contain the established requirements since a Declaration of Environmental Compliance or study of Ecological Damage was not presented, among other indications mentioned by the deputy.

However, the legislators who were members of the opposition noticed something peculiar, because in those years, in reality, the person who was in charge of the mayor’s office was the now governor of the state of Campeche, for the guinda party, Layda Sansores.

Fight in the CDMX Congress (Twitter/@AnaJVillagran)

Since Sansores San Román was within the mayor’s office from October 1, 2018 to February 4, 2021. While Lía Limón García entered the government on October 1, 2021. The contract, on the other hand, was made in May of this year.

It may interest you: Lía Limón wants the public to qualify her work and called the concentration in favor of the INE “valuable”

Therefore, in the face of the error, a series of ridicule was unleashed by the opponents that led to a confrontation in the Board of Directors of the capital’s congress.

In this regard, the deputy Luisa Gutiérrez Ureña of the PAN bench mocked after the facts, assuring that Morena was giving a change of direction towards the demand for transparency within its ranks, which would cause there to be more consensus among legislators.

“I would like to ask you if you do not believe today that it is a turning point in this Congress and not give Morena a vote of confidence since today she is presenting a point of agreement that regardless of the colors, today she is demanding transparency, don’t you think? that today is an important change of direction within Morena?

This review is found in file ASCM-178-21, which indicates that the audit was carried out at the General Directorate of Works and Urban Development (DGODU) of the Álvaro Obregón mayor’s office for the contract Rehabilitation of public buildings, within the perimeter of the mayor’s office (civil protection building).

According to the file, the ASF found that the Declaration of Environmental Compliance with folio 005252, was processed after the deadline: 181 calendar days after the start date of the works and the Environmental Damage Study was not submitted.

Since the start date of the contract work was May 24, 2021 and the declaration was received by the Ministry of the Environment (SEDEMA) until November 21, 2021.

When confronted by the federal authorities to explain the reason, the DGODU indicated that the company could not present the Declaration earlier due to the restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Given this, the auditing body pointed out that the mayor’s office should establish supervision and control mechanisms so that this type of act does not happen again.

Layda Sansores, Governor of Campeche (Twitter/ @LaydaSansores)

In this section, after reviewing the documentation in the file, the ASF determined that the invitation for the contracting procedure did not meet the requirements established in the Administrative Policies, Bases and Guidelines on Public Works.

“since he omitted to indicate the description and location of the work; the program of execution of the work; projects, plans, specifications and other necessary technical information; and the application of the tabulator of the Government of Mexico City”

The mayor’s office claimed that the catalog of concepts, location sketches, as well as the terms of reference that were delivered to the contractor company in the invitation despite the fact that they were not included in the file.

ASF on Álvaro Obregón’s contract (special)

This section indicates that the DGODU omitted to verify that the detailed execution programs, supplies of materials and equipment for permanent installation, use of labor, machinery and construction equipment for the works had the authorization of the supervisory residence.

This is contemplated in article 50 of the Public Works Law of the Federal District, where it is stipulated that the supervisory residence will be in charge of the indicated matters and will be established by the delegations before the date of initiation of the work.

According to the ASF’s analysis, the documentation presented did not have the signature of this figure.

The lawsuit between the governor of Campeche and Lía Limón began when she showed documents that showed possible irregularities in the acquisitions of Limón García. (Darkroom)

Within the section on the Execution of Public Works, they determined that the mayor’s office did not register the representatives of the agency who formalized the contract, their addresses and telephone numbers, nor those who delivered the work once the work was completed and who protected it. .

Although they corrected the supposed omission of the work residence registration, the supervision of program updates, the authorization, follow-up and payment of extraordinary concepts and excess volumes, conditions that originate variations in the program and amounts were lacking.

Among other things, he also highlighted that three withholdings were not made due to late works; 41 concepts of work that exceed the amount contracted without having the document that authorizes the execution or that determines the obligation to make a payment, as well as the lack of documentation that has the signature of the work resident that authorizes and validates extraordinary prices (of 25 additional work concepts).

---

Source

---