The police officer who killed the African-American George Floyd and inflamed the United States in 2020 is trying from Wednesday to have his murder conviction overturned during an appeal trial of essentially symbolic scope.
• Read also: “They are trying to do the same thing as George Floyd with me”
• Read also: ON VIDEO | Cousin of Black Lives Matter co-founder dies after violent police arrest
Derek Chauvin, 46, was convicted of murder by a northern Minnesota state court following a high-profile trial in 2021, and sentenced to 22½ years in prison .
He believes that his rights to a fair trial have been violated, particularly given the “publicity” surrounding the case and the “threats of violence” which should have led to a change of scenery at the hearings, and calls for the verdict to be quashed.
Whatever the outcome of this appeal, Derek Chauvin will remain in prison, because he pleaded guilty to “civil rights violations” of George Floyd before a federal judge and received in 2022 a final sentence of 21 years in prison.
“Demonized”
On May 25, 2020, this Minneapolis police officer, in office for 19 years, had remained kneeling on the neck of the black forties for nearly ten minutes, indifferent to his groans and the interventions of panicked passers-by.
The scene, filmed and posted online, sparked huge protests against racism and police brutality across the United States and beyond.
During the trial in the local court, his lawyer pleaded that George Floyd died of an overdose, combined with health problems, and assured that Derek Chauvin had made justified use of force.
Today, the former police officer seeks to invalidate this trial, especially because it was held in the twin cities of Minneapolis-Saint-Paul, which were still on edge less than a year after the tragedy.
In their request, his lawyers recall “the threats” made against the jurors, the fear of a new conflagration of the two cities in the event of an acquittal, and the daily local media coverage which “idealised George Floyd and demonized Derek Chauvin”.
« Transparent »
Lawyers for the former police officer criticize the court for having refused to organize the hearings in a rural area of the state, or failing that for not having housed the jurors away. According to them, this would have prevented them from discovering, in the middle of a trial, that the city of Minneapolis had decided to compensate, up to 27 million dollars, those close to George Floyd.
They also mention the lies of a juror who had concealed having participated in the demonstrations which followed the death of George Floyd, and accuse the prosecutors of having presented “cumulative” testimony, from seven police officers and experts on the use of force. .
Prosecutors counter, in a separate argument, that the trial was “one of the most accurate and transparent” in history, that jury selection lasted two weeks and that the verdict must be confirmed.
The two parties will present their arguments before the Court of Appeal in Saint-Paul from 9:30 a.m. (3:30 p.m. GMT) and the hearings will, as in the first trial, be televised.
Three other police officers, who had remained passive during the agony of George Floyd, received sentences ranging from two and a half to three and a half years in prison.
:quality(85)//cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/infobae/P2PKEKWKQRE5NMWENSIPY3EKBQ.jpg)
:quality(85)//cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/infobae/L4SQH6ERAJD3XMYPPCQ6MXFMRQ.jpg)
:quality(80)/cdn-kiosk-api.telegraaf.nl/a8ec151c-bf9e-11ed-a5a3-0218eaf05005.jpg)
